Search This Blog

Sunday, April 19, 2026

House Retirements 2026

Our most recent book is The Comeback: The 2024 Elections and American PoliticsIt includes a chapter on congressional and state elections

 Abby Ward and Molly E. Reynolds at Brookings:

Just over halfway through the 119th Congress, 56 House members have announced their retirement plans, marking the highest number in over 30 years. (An additional five have resigned before completing their terms.) Out of the 56 members retiring this year, 35 (63%) are Republicans, meaning that around 16% of the party’s 217-member conference is stepping down. This group includes 18 subcommittee chairs and three committee chairs.

While retirements generally have consequences for the House as an institution, there are reasons to pay particular attention to the career choices of majority-party members, as they may send signals about party morale heading into an election season.

For instance, the last time Congress saw close to this many retirements was in 2018, and a similarly high share (65%) was from the Republican majority. At the time, some observers saw the large number of retirements as evidence of an anxious Republican Party, and subsequent analyses would eventually connect the number of seat vacancies to the blue wave that followed in that year’s midterms.

The number of retirements is not the only feature that makes this cycle consequential. In addition to being large in number, this year’s class of retirees—and particularly those from the majority—are notable for two additional reasons. First, many are early in their congressional tenures. Second, many are leaving to run for other offices, including at the state level. Both of these dynamics suggest there may be something bigger than midterm anxiety at play, perhaps reflecting broader frustration with Congress as an institution and workplace.

Saturday, April 18, 2026

Democrats Cool on Israel

Our most recent book is The Comeback: The 2024 Elections and American PoliticsIt includes a chapter on congressional and state elections

Andrew Solender and Justin Green at Axios:

Zoom in: Every Senate Democrat who's eyeing a 2028 presidential run voted against arms sales to Israel in votes earlier this week.

  • 40 Senate Dems voted on a resolution to block arms sales to Israel, up from just 15 on a similar vote last April.
  • Netanyahu is "destroying the bipartisan nature in terms of support for Israel," Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) told Punchbowl News.

Over in the House, some Democrats are turning against defensive support, including funding for Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system.

  • That was "seen as insanely fringe four years ago," Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) told Axios.
  • But multiple Democrats who voted for Iron Dome in 2021 told Axios they're done providing financial aid.
The big picture: Older Republicans and white Evangelicals are the last groups to hold majority favorable views of Israel, according to recent Pew polling.

For every other group, Israel's favorability has collapsed since 2022.

  • ⬇️ Down 31 percentage points among older Democrats (ages 50+).
  • ⬇️ Down 22 percentage points among both younger Republicans/GOP leaners and younger Dems/Dem leaners.
  • ⬇️ Down 14 percentage points among Protestants, 23 among Catholics and 20 among the religiously unaffiliated.
  • ⬇️ Even white Evangelical support, which was at 80% in 2022, has slid by 15 points.

Friday, April 17, 2026

Swalwell Aftershocks

 Our most recent book is The Comeback: The 2024 Elections and American PoliticsIt includes a chapter on congressional and state elections

Dakota Smith and Nicole Nixon at LAT:

  • Former Rep. Eric Swalwell appeared positioned to lead California’s Democratic gubernatorial field after powerful state institutions and Newsom allies rallied behind the anti-Trump darling before his campaign’s sudden collapse.
  • Explosive allegations that Swalwell sexually assaulted a former staffer and acted inappropriately with other women prompted his exit from the race and resignation from Congress, allegations he denies.
  • Democratic leaders and the groups that backed him — including labor unions and interest groups — now face scrutiny over whether they missed red flags or ignored warnings about his rumored behavior.
Why did it take so long for the allegations to become public?  Mark Z. Barabak, also at LAT:

If the allegations are true and Swalwell is, in fact, a liar, lecher and sexual assailant, why wasn’t that widely reported up until now? Was it negligence, or gullibility on the part of the political press corps? The short answer is that a wide gulf exists between rumor and fact and Swalwell lurked in that gray space, living and thriving in the shadows between provability and denial.

It’s not unusual for rumors about financial, sexual or other peccadilloes to attend a campaign. They’re often trafficked by political rivals, which automatically raises suspicion and invites particular skepticism.

Much of the chatter never moves past a relatively small, dishy circle of political gossips because the supposed misdeeds, while titillating, can’t stand up to rigorous scrutiny. Or a legal challenge. That’s the baseline for many news outlets to broadcast or publish a story. Call them what you will — legacy, corporate, mainstream, lamestream — many of the largest, most influential sources of news and information won’t pass along allegations they can’t independently verify and, if necessary, defend in court.

The challenge is verifying all that loose talk.

Politicians don’t wear body cams, or broadcast their lives 24/7. (OK, Beto O’Rourke did livestream from a Texas laundromat during his 2018 Senate bid, holding up a soggy pair of underwear when he addressed the “boxers or briefs” question. But he’s an exception.)

Journalists don’t have subpoena power and can’t force people to tell them what they know. A reporter is only as good as his or her sources, their knowledge, truthfulness and credibility.

Reporting on misdeeds of an intimate nature can be especially difficult and complex. There’s rarely black-and-white documentation, such as a money trail leading to a hotel bedroom. It’s hard to find an eyewitness or reliable third party who can vouch for what took place between people behind closed doors. It takes time and trust to develop sources who can substantiate incidents of sexual misconduct, assault or abuse.


Thursday, April 16, 2026

Midterms Look Bad for the GOP

Our most recent book is The Comeback: The 2024 Elections and American PoliticsIt includes a chapter on congressional and state elections

Dash Burns at Politico:

A sputtering economy, high gas prices, a fight with the pope and a pair of foreign policy setbacks — in Pakistan and Hungary — have left many White House allies newly exasperated as they try to navigate what was always going to be a difficult midterm year.

...

Trump’s weaves and fights are nothing new. But they come at an increasingly inconvenient time for a party clinging to razor-thin margins in Congress. Polls show Trump’s handling of the economy at career lows. A significant number of Republicans don’t support the war in Iran, and the White House spent part of Monday defending and then deleting a meme of Trump as Jesus Christ that infuriated many MAGA warriors.

“I was surprised at the number of strong Trump supporting evangelicals who were willing to criticize him,” said Erick Erickson, a conservative radio host and an influential voice with evangelical voters central to the MAGA base. “The problem ultimately is as he becomes a lame duck more and more people start to move beyond him. If he wants to minimize people looking to 2028 past him, he can’t do stuff like this. It minimizes the ability to keep the focus on him and his policies as people finally get tired of it. That’s bad for the midterms and bad for his ability to advance his agenda.”


Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Trump v. the Pope, continuted

Our books have discussed Trump's low character, which was on display this weekend. His political judgment is getting worse, as is clear from his attacks on the Pope and his Jesus posts.



 

Elizabeth Dias and Motoko Rich at NYT:
Donald Trump ascended to office 10 years ago while publicly jousting with Pope Francis, who was routinely making headlines for the progressive Catholicism he elevated, pushing the Roman Catholic Church to focus on climate change and the rights of immigrants. The pope suggested that Mr. Trump was “not Christian”; Mr. Trump fired back that Francis was “disgraceful.”

Mr. Trump capitalized on growing discontent among conservative Christians and won the White House. The chasm only further widened between the Vatican and conservative American Catholics, who often saw in Mr. Trump a champion.

Pope Leo XIV, who was elected less than a year ago, is not Francis. For Mr. Trump, who is now in his second term, he presents a new foil at the Vatican with a markedly different standing among Catholics. As the first American in the seat of St. Peter, he has a native fluency in American politics and culture, and his leadership is supported across broad swaths of the American church.

....

Unlike his predecessor, Leo has growing support from conservative Catholics in pews across the United States. As the anniversary of his election approaches next month, he has so significantly rebuilt the Vatican’s relationship with the American Catholic right that many in Mr. Trump’s own camp rushed to the pope’s defense on Monday.

Interviews with conservatives attending Mass at Catholic parishes across the country revealed significant displeasure with the president for his harsh criticism of the pope, a dynamic hard to imagine not long ago.

...

Leo has an 84 percent favorability rating among American Catholics, with overwhelmingly high support regardless of political party, according to a Pew Research Center survey from last year. Francis’ favorability rating was just as high the first year of his papacy, but by the time of his death it had dropped to 78 percent.

Monday, April 13, 2026

Trump Attacks the Pope and Compares HImself to Jesus (not kidding)

 Our books have discussed Trump's low character, which was on display this weekend.


Sunday, April 12, 2026

Iran and Consumer Sentiment


Consumer sentiment fell in April to the lowest level recorded in the 70-plus-year history of the University of Michigan’s survey, evidence of Americans’ concerns that the Iran war will hit the domestic economy.

The survey’s initial April reading came in at 47.6, versus 53.3 in March. Analysts polled by The Wall Street Journal were expecting a drop to 52. The April reading is below the previous low point of 50 recorded in June 2022, when the economy was facing searing inflation.

The initial April results are based almost entirely on interviews that took place between March 24 and April 6, before a tentative cease-fire took hold. The survey will be updated with a final April reading later this month, based on more recent responses.

The darker economic mood was widespread across people of different ages, income levels and political affiliations, said Joanne Hsu, the survey’s director. “Many consumers blame the Iran conflict for unfavorable changes to the economy,” she said.